Drawing for DIGITAL HARBOR CONNECTING THE DOTS

USPTO serial 99674047

DIGITAL HARBOR CONNECTING THE DOTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, TARYN E
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIGITAL HARBOR CONNECTING THE DOTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kimberly A. Berger

Kimberly A. Berger Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone, PLC150 W. Jefferson, Ste. 2500Suite 105Detroit, MI 48226

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer software development; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in database management, for service desk management, for accounting, and for reducing complexity for knowledge workers by ensuring compliance with Affordable Care Act requirements and seamlessly enabling enrollment, screening, and continuous monitoring of providers, specifically, doctors, hospitals and licensed institutionsACTIVEJun 1, 2022

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 19, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 15, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 15, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 15, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 9, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 9, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 9, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 27, 2026MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 27, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 27, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance