USPTO serial 99675269
CHUBBY CHEEKS BRAND OF GOURMET FOODS LETS "MEAT UP" AT THE GRILL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 616
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHOEN,LINDSEY O
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHUBBY CHEEKS BRAND OF GOURMET FOODS LETS "MEAT UP" AT THE GRILL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Escondido, CA, US
Escondido, CA, US
Escondido, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A Chase
David A Chase US Trademark Associates5260 California AveIrvine, CA 92617United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Barbecue sauce; Barbecue dry rub; Barbeque sauce; Sauces for barbecued meat; Barbecue sauces, namely; Honey barbecue sauce, Sweet and smoky barbecue sauce, Hickory smoked barbecue sauce, Mesquite barbecue sauce, Spicy barbecue sauce, Hot barbecue sauce, Mild barbecue sauce, Garlic barbecue sauce, Bourbon barbecue sauce, Whiskey barbecue sauce, Brown sugar barbecue sauce. Advertising and marketing services; online retail store services featuring barbecue sauces and food condiments. Custom manufacturing of sauce | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Jesse Duda
- Other trademarks owned by Charles Merhoff
- Other trademarks owned by John Christensen
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named CHUBBY CHEEKS BRAND OF GOURMET FOODS LETS "MEAT UP" AT THE GRILL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 21, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 21, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 6, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2026 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 10, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |