USPTO serial 99679965
PERSONA AI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MASTEE, BRIAN JAMES
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 134
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PERSONA AI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
April L. Besl
April L. Besl Dinsmore & Shohl LLP255 East Fifth Street, Suite 1900Cincinnati, OH 45202United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Industrial robots in the nature of manufacturing robots; industrial robots; control mechanisms for industrial robots, namely, hydraulic and pneumatic controls for industrial robot machines ; hydraulic and pneumatic valve actuators for robots; automatic control mechanisms for robots, namely, automatic hydraulic and pneumatic controls for robot machines; control mechanisms for robots, namely, hydraulic and pneumatic controls for robot machines; driving devices for robots, namely, drives for robot machines; industrial robots, namely, interactive robots with artificial intelligence for industrial use; industrial robots, namely, electrically powered walking robots for industrial use; industrial robots, namely, collaborative robots with artificial intelligence for industrial use; robotic exoskeleton suits being machines for personal mobility, not for medical purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Humanoid robots with artificial intelligence for use in scientific research; humanoid robots having communication and learning functions for assisting and entertaining people; laboratory robots; teaching robots; telepresence robots; security surveillance robots; humanoid robots with artificial intelligence for use in manufacturing processes; electric control apparatus for robots, namely, electronic controllers for robots; humanoid robots with artificial intelligence for use in industrial applications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 2, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2026 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |