Drawing for HUMANS FIRST

USPTO serial 99680935

HUMANS FIRST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OH, HYUN-JUNG
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 129

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HUMANS FIRST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Garner K Weng

Garner K Weng Hanson Bridgett LLP425 Market Street, 26th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94105United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Promoting public interest in and awareness of topics of interest to those in the fields of activism and community organizing relating to safe and beneficial development and governance of AI; Providing a website that promotes public awareness of principles of safe and beneficial development and governance of AI; Association services, namely, promoting the interests of individuals interested in activism and community organizing relating to safe and beneficial development and governance of AIACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely, providing information and on-line and in-person conferences, classes, seminars, and workshops in the fields of activism and community organizing relating to safe and beneficial development and governance of AI; Providing a website featuring educatinal information and news in the field of activism and community organizing relating to safe and beneficial development and governance of AIACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 2, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 1, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 1, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 1, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 3, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 3, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance