USPTO serial 99684860
ONECOMMAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 681
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEDNARZ, DUSTIN THOMAS
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ONECOMMAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cissna Park, IL, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel J Coughlin
Daniel J Coughlin Coughlin Law Office821 Main St.Sabetha, KS 66534United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable industrial process control software; Signal conditioning and communication devices for industrial process control; Downloadable business software for industrial process control, customer relationship management, and business process management of enterprise resources, in the field of agricultural automation, bulk material handling, and industrial process management; Downloadable business process management software for real-time equipment and inventory visualization, operator equipment control, workflow automation, material tracking, transaction history, material traceability, in the field of agricultural automation, bulk material handling, and industrial process management; Downloadable business process management and industrial process control software for use in monitoring, reporting, and control of and integration with industrial equipment and business systems, in the field of agricultural automation, bulk material handling, and industrial process management | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for industrial process control, customer relationship management, and business process management of enterprise resources, in the field of agricultural automation, bulk material handling, and industrial process management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring business process management software for real-time equipment and inventory visualization, operator equipment control, workflow automation, material tracking, transaction history, material traceability, in the field of agricultural automation, bulk material handling, and industrial process management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring business process management and industrial process control software for use in monitoring, reporting, and control of and integration with industrial equipment and business systems, in the field of agricultural automation, bulk material handling, and industrial process management | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 31, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 13, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |