USPTO serial 99686928
THIMBLES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RIEPEL, CHRISTINA MAXINE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THIMBLES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
YAKUP SARI
YAKUP SARI SARI LAW FIRM540 N Golden Cir. Dr,#303SANTA ANA, CA 92705Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Multimedia publishing relating to computer game software; Multimedia publishing relating to video game software; Electronic games services provided by means of the internet; Providing online computer games; Entertainment services, namely, providing games of chance via the Internet; Entertainment services in the nature of development, creation, production and post-production services of multimedia entertainment content; Entertainment services in the nature of creation, development, and production of television programming; Entertainment services in the nature of development, creation, production, distribution, and post-production of television shows; Production of television programs; Online computer gaming services; Entertainment services, namely, providing online electronic games; Entertainment services, namely, providing on-line reviews of a computer network or mobile phone network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 28, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 7, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |