Drawing for MICRO-VIEW

USPTO serial 99687546

MICRO-VIEW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SINGH, TEJBIR
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MICRO-VIEW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Caitlin R. Byczko

Caitlin R. Byczko Barnes & Thornburg LLP11 South Meridian StreetIndianapolis, IN 46204United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Wholesale ordering services in the field of animal feed and feed supplementsACTIVE—
040feed mill services, namely, manufacturing of livestock feed for othersACTIVE—
042Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in feed mill control and data logging; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for configuring orders, quoting prices on, and ordering animal feed and feed supplements; providing electronic verification of on-line orders of animal feed and feed supplementsACTIVE—
044providing nutritional information about animal feed ingredients, animal food ingredients, animal feed, and animal foodstuff; food nutrition consultation regarding animal feed ingredients, animal food ingredients, animal feed, and animal foodstuff; Information, consultancy, and advisory services in connection with animal nutrition, and nutritional information pertaining to animal feed type and qualityACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 30, 2026NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 10, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 10, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 7, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 4, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 6, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 6, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance