USPTO serial 99687643
ENTERPRISE CYBER ECONOMICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 616
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JACKSON, DONOVAN ALEXANDER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENTERPRISE CYBER ECONOMICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Southborough, MA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gwenn Roos
Gwenn Roos Law Office of Gwenn Roos26 Brookdale AvenueWellesley, MA 02482United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Technology consultation in the field of cybersecurity; Monitoring of computer systems to detect cybersecurity incidents; Cybersecurity services in the nature of restricting unauthorized access to computer systems; Computer security services, namely, enforcing, restricting and controlling access privileges of users of computing resources for cloud, mobile or network resources based on assigned credentials; Computer security service, namely, restricting access to and by computer networks to and of undesired web sites, media and individuals and facilities; Development of customized software for others for use in risk assessment, information security, business analysis, audit and audit planning, and sales management; Development of security systems and contingency planning for information systems; Maintenance of computer software relating to computer security and prevention of computer risks; Updating of computer software relating to computer security and prevention of computer risks; Computer security services in the nature of administering digital keys; Computer security services, namely, restricting unauthorized access to computer networks, hardware, software; Computer security consultancy in the field of cyber security; Computer security threat analysis for protecting data; Data security consultancy; Internet security consultancy; Computer security consultancy in the field of scanning and penetration testing of computers and networks to assess information security vulnerability; Computer security consultancy; Telecommunication network security consultancy; Computer network security consultancy | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2026 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 1, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 29, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 9, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |