USPTO serial 99691629
ZIP-N-SHIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CREEF, DAVIS W
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZIP-N-SHIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David L. Oppenhuizen
David L. Oppenhuizen Oppenhuizen Law PLC625 Kenmoor Ave. SESte. 301Grand Rapids, MI 49546Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 022 | Reusable, recyclable industrial plastic transport bags being bags for the transport of materials in bulk for consolidating and transporting packaged goods within commercial logistics and distribution networks; Reusable, resealable, recyclable plastic transport bags being bags for the transport of materials in bulk featuring hanging openings and document pouches for use in automated sorting and bulk handling systems in commercial distribution facilities; Heavy-duty reusable, recyclable polymer transport bags being bags for the transport of materials in bulk for bulk handling and internal distribution of packaged goods in commercial warehouse and logistics operations; Reusable, plastic bulk handling bags being bags for the storage and transport of materials in bulk for storage and transport of packaged goods in commercial environments | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 12, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 9, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |