USPTO serial 99692356
SÖLT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VAFAI, NIKKI
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 134
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with SÖLT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fuquay Varina, NC, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin C Brown
Kevin C Brown Brown & Brown IP Law PLLCSuite 109A6700 Old Collamer RoadEast Syracuse, NY 13057Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software for managing restaurant operations; Downloadable software for managing restaurant operations, namely, managing and correlating data for pricing, supply availability, supplier contact information, supply quality, supply, supply expiration, customer history and feedback, ingredient specifications, reservations, menu orders, and/or table assignments; Downloadable software for updating and displaying electronic restaurant menus; Downloadable software for determining preparation costs for menu items; Downloadable software for determining preparation profit margins for menu items; Downloadable software for communicating with restaurant customers regarding table availability and assignment; Downloadable software for analyzing restaurant staff performance; Downloadable software for determining restaurant staff training and discipline; Downloadable software for generating advertising for restaurants; Downloadable software for placing orders for restaurant supplies | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development of computer software for managing restaurant operations; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for managing restaurant operations; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software and applications for managing restaurant operations; Consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Providing on-line non-downloadable software for managing restaurant operations; Design and development of computer software for managing restaurant operations, namely, managing and correlating data for pricing, supply availability, quality, inventory, supply expiration, supplier information, customer history and feedback, ingredients, reservations, orders, table assignments, electronic menus, preparation costs, profit margins, table availability and assignment, staff performance, staff training and discipline, advertising, and/or orders for supplies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |