USPTO serial 99693238
OBJECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MMEJE, OBIEZE GINIKANWA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OBJECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fremont, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
VIVEK HEMANT VAIDYA
2181 Greenwich St.San Francisco, CA 94123United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Design and development of computer software for artificial intelligence machine learning; Research and development of technology in the field of artificial intelligence; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software and applications using artificial intelligence (AI) for machine learning development, image processing, feature analysis, automated metrology, anomaly inspection, and robotics control; Consultancy in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) technology; Technical consulting in the field of monitoring technological functions of humanoid robots with artificial intelligence (AI); Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for data collection, data management, data analysis, predictive modeling, and process control and optimization | ACTIVE | May 7, 2024 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 5, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2026 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |