USPTO serial 99693446
GENESIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, BRIDGETT G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GENESIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carissa L. Bouwer
Carissa L. Bouwer DLA Piper3203 Hanover Street, Suite 100Palo Alto, CA 94304United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Industrial robots for household chores, warehouse assistance, and laboratory assistance | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence (AI) for software development, machine learning, and computer vision for robotics; Downloadable software for machine learning for use in robots; Downloadable machine learning software for enabling computers to learn to perform tasks autonomously; Downloadable computer programs using artificial intelligence (AI) for robotic control and navigation; Downloadable operating system software for robots; Downloadable software for programming physical movements for use in robots; Downloadable computer software for collecting, analyzing and organizing data in the field of deep learning; Downloadable computer software using machine learning for developing predictive models; Downloadable computer software using machine learning for creating data models; Downloadable computer software development tools; Downloadable computer software for use as an application programming interface (API); Downloadable application programming interface (API) software; Downloadable software development kits (SDK); Downloadable application programming interface (API) software for accessing artificial intelligence models and services; Downloadable software for monitoring and controlling communication between computers and automated machine systems; Tactical robots; User-programmable humanoid robots, not configured; all of the foregoing in the field of household chores assistance, warehouse assistance, and laboratory assistance | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 17, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |