USPTO serial 99695162
19TH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 19TH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Walnut Creek, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Phillip Thomas Horton
Phillip Thomas Horton THE RAPACKE LAW GROUP, P.A.3750 Birch TerraceDavie, FL 33330United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable mobile applications for artificial intelligence models; Downloadable software for running local models; downloadable software for computers, tablets, and phones featuring software development tools | ACTIVE | Feb 2, 2026 |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for designing, launching, and monitoring artificial intelligence models; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for programming API and interfaces; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for enabling third-party access to developing models; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for software development tools; software as a service (SaaS) featuring software libraries; software as a service (SaaS) featuring mobile application software; software as a service (SaaS) featuring desktop application software; providing temporary use of non-downloadable application programming interfaces (APIs) for accessing artificial intelligence models; providing temporary use of non-downloadable cloud-based software platforms for designing artificial intelligence models; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for cloud-based software platforms for launching artificial intelligence models; providing temporary use of non-downloadable cloud-based software platforms for monitoring artificial intelligence models; providing temporary use of non-downloadable cloud-based infrastructure services for deploying and managing artificial intelligence models | ACTIVE | Feb 2, 2026 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 13, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2026 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |