USPTO serial 99695480
AD LITEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RHIM, ANDREW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with AD LITEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Middletown, CT, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Benoit
David Benoit Aeton Law Partners LLP311 Centerpoint DriveMiddletown, CT 06457United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for for creating and ensuring content quality standards in documents; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for business analytics; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for data analytics; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for preparing, generating, creating, reviewing, negotiating, drafting, editing, viewing, analyzing, auditing and managing documents, contracts, agreements and legal agreements; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for preparing, generating, creating, collaborating, reviewing, negotiating, drafting, editing, viewing, analyzing, auditing and managing commercial and litigation documents, including templates, pleadings, contracts, and agreements; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for preparing, generating, creating, collaborating, reviewing, negotiating, drafting, editing, viewing, analyzing, auditing and managing commercial and litigation documents, including templates, pleading, contracts, and agreements; Design and development of computer software for document management and productivity; Computer software development in the field of document management and productivity; Computer software development, computer programming and maintenance of computer software for document management and productivity | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 14, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |