Drawing for THE LINE BETWEEN GOOD AND GREAT

USPTO serial 99697188

THE LINE BETWEEN GOOD AND GREAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPEAKE, WADE E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE LINE BETWEEN GOOD AND GREAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rajesh Fotedar

Rajesh Fotedar Cognition IP50 California StSuite 1500San Francisco, CA 94111

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Golf ball marker stencils; Golf accessories, namely, holders specially adapted for holding golf ball marker stencilsACTIVEJan 25, 2026
041Providing information relating to the sport of golf, specifically golf ball marker stencils via a website; Providing information relating to the sport of golf, specifically holders specially adapted for golf ball marker stencils via a websiteACTIVEJan 25, 2026

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 29, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 29, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 28, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 28, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 28, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 23, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 11, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 11, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance