USPTO serial 99697859
FUJITSU KOZUCHI ENTERPRISE AI FACTORY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEATING, SHANNON B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FUJITSU KOZUCHI ENTERPRISE AI FACTORY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Danielle I Mattessich
Danielle I Mattessich Merchant & Gould P.C.P.O. Box 2910150 S. Fifth Street, Suite 2200Minneapolis, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computers; computer servers; computer hardware for data storage; computer peripheral devices; downloadable computer software for optimizing business performance management | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business management analysis; business consultancy; marketing research; marketing analysis; conducting business research and surveys; providing information concerning commercial sales; business management and organization consultancy; compilation of information into computer databases; providing business assistance to others in the operation of data processing apparatus namely, computers and other similar office machines; consulting services in the fields of data analysis | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer programming services; computer rental services; server hosting; rental of web servers; optimization services for computers, namely, computer networks and computer software configuration; installation of computer software; maintenance and upgrading of computer software, namely, enhancing functions of computer software, changing or adding functions of computer software, and providing information thereon; computer system consulting and advisory services; providing technical information about computers, computer software and computer networks; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for optimizing business performance management; platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for optimizing business performance management; providing temporary use of non-downloadable cloud-based software for optimizing business performance management through the collection, monitoring, visualization and storage of data | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 20, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |