USPTO serial 99699615
SOFTWARE FACTORY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHEEHY, CONNOR RYAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 138
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SOFTWARE FACTORY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Katherine M. Basile
Katherine M. Basile Reed Smith LLPP.O. Box 488Pittsburgh, PA 15230United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management consulting services featuring consultation in the design and development of business management tools; Providing product development and engineering services for others in the field of business management | ACTIVE | Mar 4, 2026 |
| 042 | Providing product development and engineering services for others in the field of software design, software architecture, database design, and database architecture; Providing consultation in the design and development of technology in the fields of artificial intelligence, computer science, and computer software design and development; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for implementing a proprietary software architecture method; Providing a website featuring educational information in the fields of software design, software architecture, database design, and database architecture; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for content sharing and collaboration; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for project and task management; Providing on-line non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence (AI) for business knowledge management and collaboration, general work management, project tracking, document management; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software featuring artificial intelligence for developing software; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software featuring artificial intelligence for developing business management tools; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring integration software for integrating different applications into a single application | ACTIVE | Mar 4, 2026 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 29, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 11, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |