USPTO serial 99705437
HILBERT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with HILBERT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SAN FRANCISCO, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ben Natter
Ben Natter Haug Partners, LLP745 Fifth AvenueNew York, NY 10151United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Marketing services rendered using artificial intelligence (AI); Consultancy services regarding business strategies | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financial advisory services rendered using artificial intelligence (AI) | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) featuring software using artificial intelligence for analyzing data and interacting with humans; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable chatbot software using artificial intelligence (AI) for providing business consultation in the field of analyzing data for improving business metrics related to marketing, user database and unit economics; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for analyzing data for improving business metrics related to marketing, user database and unit economics; Providing on-line non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence (AI) for analyzing data for improving business metrics related to marketing, user database and unit economics; Design and development of software for machine learning | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 1, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 4, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 20, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |