USPTO serial 99706331
MAXD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 681
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRIEDMAN, LESLEE ANN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAXD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Lakeland, TN, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SCOTT M. DOUGLASS
SCOTT M. DOUGLASS BAKER, DONELSON, BEARMAN, CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ, PC165 Madison Avenue, Suite 2000Memphis, TN 38103United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Protective gloves for industrial use; protective work gloves for protection against chemicals; safety gloves for workplace protection against accidents or injury; protective work gloves; personal protective equipment, namely, safety gloves being protective work gloves and safety suits being protective suits for protection against accidents or injury and disposable coveralls for protection against accidents or injury; chemical resistant gloves for industrial use; heat-resistant gloves for industrial use; cut-resistant gloves for industrial use; safety footwear, namely, protective industrial footwear; safety boots being protective industrial boots; hard hats | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Medical gloves; surgical gloves; examination gloves for medical use; disposable gloves for medical purposes; protective gloves for medical use; safety gloves being medical gloves and safety suits being protective suits for operating rooms | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Gloves as clothing; protective clothing being hi-visibility clothing for protection against the sun; work boots; safety boots being work boots; work headwear | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advisory services being providing consumer information relating to the selection of personal protective equipment; advertising and marketing services; advertising services for private label products; business consulting services in the field of occupational safety equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Product development consultation in the nature of consulting services in the field of personal protective equipment specification; conducting onsite safety audits in order to determine personal protective equipment needs assessmen | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 17, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 17, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 22, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |