USPTO serial 99707268
BLACK DUCK CONTEXTAI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VAFAI, NIKKI
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 134
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BLACK DUCK CONTEXTAI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anna Kurian Shaw
Anna Kurian Shaw Hogan Lovells Cadwalader US LLP555 13th Street NWWashington, DC 20004United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring artificial intelligence-enabled software applications for software security testing and vulnerability management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring artificial intelligence-enabled software applications for software security testing and vulnerability management in connection with integrations involving a particular open-source software standard; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring artificial intelligence-enabled software applications for use in identifying, verifying, analyzing, testing, and improving software application vulnerabilities; Providing online non-downloadable agentic software for use in identifying, verifying, analyzing, testing, and improving software application vulnerabilities; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring artificial intelligence-enabled software applications for identifying computer software defects, ensuring regulatory compliance, and analyzing software applications and computer code; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring artificial intelligence-enabled software applications for security testing of web-based software applications; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring artificial intelligence-enabled software applications for analyzing software composition for the purpose of managing risk from use of open source and third-party software code in software applications and containers; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring artificial intelligence-enabled software applications for the purpose of software application security management to scale testing, remediation, and risk management; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring artificial intelligence-enabled software applications for the purpose of discovering and remediating software security weaknesses; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring artificial intelligence-enabled software applications for detection of security threats and vulnerabilities in computer code; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring artificial intelligence-enabled software applications for conducting computer software audits and reporting the results of such audits; Consultation services in the field of design, development, and testing of computer code; Computer software consulting services in the field of application development, code review, and computer security; Computer security consultation in the field of monitoring, analyzing, scanning and testing computer code using artificial intelligence | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 28, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |