USPTO serial 99707666
VEO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KALUGIN, KATHERINE ELAINE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 303
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VEO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Monica, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Larry H. Tronco
Larry H. Tronco Holland & Hart, LLPPO Box 8749Trademark DocketingDenver, CO 80201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for renting of vehicles in the field of vehicle sharing and use of vehicles; Downloadable computer software for renting of bicycles and scooters in the field of personal transportation | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Bicycles; Electrically-powered motor scooters; Electric bicycles | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Bicycle sharing services; Vehicle sharing services, namely, providing temporary use of bicycles, electric bicycles, hybrid electric bicycles, electric scooters and pedal assist electric bicycles; Rental of vehicles for transportation in the nature of bicycles, electric bicycles, hybrid electric bicycles, electric scooters and pedal assist electric bicycles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 24, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |