USPTO serial 99709999
DR.REJUCORE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LUEKEN, ABIGAIL JOSEPHINE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DR.REJUCORE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas R. Wolf
Douglas R. Wolf Wolf Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.600 Atlantic AvenueBoston, MA 02210United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Beauty masks; cosmetics; lotions for cosmetic purposes; cosmetic preparations for skin care; oils for cosmetic purposes; lip glosses; make-up; sunscreen preparations; cream for whitening the skin; essential oils serums for cosmetic purposes; non-medicated skin serums; eye cream; facial cleansing preparations; skin cleansers; tissues impregnated with a skin cleanser; foam cleansers for personal use; gel eye patches for cosmetic purposes; lip balm; toners for cosmetic purposes; skin toners; mask pack for cosmetic purposes; sheet masks for the face for cosmetic use; cosmetic facial packs; pore contraction mask packs for use as cosmetics; body lotion; body cream; skin lotion; nutrition cream being skin cream; skin whitening and lightening cream; non-medicated functional cosmetics, namely, anti-aging creams; hair shampoo | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 31, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |