USPTO serial 99710448
THE ONENESS METHOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DANG, PETER T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE ONENESS METHOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roberta L. Christensen
Roberta L. Christensen Koley Jessen P.C., L.L.O.One Pacific Place, Suite 8001125 S 103rd StreetOmaha, NE 68124Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and peripherals; Downloadable computer software for display, organization, transmission, reception and searching of information in the field of self- and personal improvement and empowerment, religion, and spirituality; Multimedia software recorded on CD-ROM featuring self- and personal improvement and empowerment, religion, and spirituality; Pre-recorded DVDs featuring self- and personal improvement and empowerment, religion, and spirituality; Cinematographic films featuring self- and personal improvement and empowerment, religion, and spirituality; Visual and audio recordings featuring self- and personal improvement and empowerment, religion, and spirituality; Magnetic tape units for computers; Pre-recorded magnetic discs featuring self- and personal improvement and empowerment, religion, and spirituality, machine-readable; Encoded smart cards containing programming used for display, organization, transmission, reception and searching of information in the field of self- and personal improvement and empowerment, religion, and spirituality; Compact discs featuring self- and personal improvement and empowerment, religion, and spirituality; Electronic publications, namely, e-zines featuring self- and personal improvement and empowerment, religion, and spirituality recorded on computer media | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 21, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 24, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |