USPTO serial 99710608
FLEUR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 681
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LADZEKPO, ASHIMADI DELA KOSHI
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLEUR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marek Krizka
Marek Krizka TRAMA LEGAL, PLLC1178 BROADWAY FL 3New York, NY 10001United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for generating images from text using artificial intelligence; Downloadable computer programs for editing images, sound, and video; Downloadable computer software for processing digital images; Downloadable computer software for creating digital animation and special effects of images; Downloadable graphic design templates; Downloadable computer application software for mobile phones, portable media players, and handheld computers, namely, software for generating and editing images and videos using artificial intelligence; Downloadable computer software for providing artificial intelligence (AI) powered multimedia synthesis, in particular for, text-to-video, text-to-image, image-to-image, image-to-video, and video-to-video generation, and for creative content creation and digital image processing | ACTIVE | Oct 17, 2025 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2026 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Aug 31, 2026 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Aug 21, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 4, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 30, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |