USPTO serial 99711413
GLODCREST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DIAZ, GABRIEL M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 302
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GLODCREST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pingdu Shandong, CN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LOWELL LEE CARSON JR
LOWELL LEE CARSON JR POLYMATH IP COUNSEL, LLC3265 W. Bellewood Dr.Englewood, CO 80110United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Lids for toilet seats; Gas fired water heaters; Air washers; Range hoods; Cooking stoves; Installations for heating swimming pools; Bread-making machines; Ice machines; Electrically-heated lunch boxes | ACTIVE | Feb 23, 2026 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 3, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2026 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |