USPTO serial 99713001
TEKMATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AGYEKUM, STEPHEN YIADOM BOAKY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 303
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with TEKMATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
North York, ON, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karen K. Won
Karen K. Won MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.COne Financial CenterBoston, MA 02111United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer programs for mobile phones and devices for creating and distributing corporate technical training content, and creating video content for visualization of equipment and instructions for servicing equipment; Downloadable computer programs for mobile phones and devices for managing the servicing of equipment, administration of users in receiving corporate technical training content (including images, videos, and documents), and custom messaging related to servicing of equipment; Non-downloadable software for use as a web platform for creating and distributing corporate technical training content, and creating video content for visualization of equipment and instructions for servicing equipment; Non-downloadable software for use as a web platform for managing the servicing of equipment, administration of users in receiving corporate technical training content (including images, videos, and documents), and custom messaging related to service of equipment. | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing access to consultation services in the development and delivery of corporate technical training programs, including services relating to production of corporate technical training content including easy-to-understand images, training videos and documents for visualization of equipment and incorporating instructions for servicing equipment, and collection of customer information and materials related to development of corporate technical training content and servicing equipment. | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS ) services featuring online access to a web platform for creating and distributing corporate technical training content, creating video content for visualization of equipment and instructions for servicing equipment, managing the servicing of equipment, and administration of users in receiving corporate technical training content (including images, videos, and documents), and custom messaging related to servicing of equipment. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |