USPTO serial 99715242
PERÚ GOURMET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DANG, BAO-NGOC K
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with PERÚ GOURMET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Todd Wengrovsky
Todd Wengrovsky Law Offices of Todd Wengrovsky, PLLC.285 Southfield Road, Box 585Calverton, NY 11933United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Peruvian food stuff imported from Peru, all the ingredients are gourmet and high quality like the best flavors of Incas land, namely, processed peppers, and processed olives | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2016 |
| 030 | Peruvian food stuff imported from Peru, all the ingredients are gourmet and high quality like the best flavors of Incas land, namely, pepper paste for use as a condiment | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Oct 14, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |