Drawing for FOS AERIAL SYSTEMS

USPTO serial 99718567

FOS AERIAL SYSTEMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EISNACH, MICHAEL PATRICK
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FOS AERIAL SYSTEMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathryn A. Gromlovits

Kathryn A. Gromlovits Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLPSuite 2200101 South Tryon StreetCharlotte, NC 28280

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and structural parts therefor; Unmanned aircraft systems (UASs) primarily comprised of drones and ground-based control stations and structural parts therefor; drones and structural parts thereforACTIVE—
013Anti-drone ammunition; munitions; munitions containing netsACTIVE—
037Technical support, namely, technical advice concerning installation, repair and maintenance for Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), Unmanned aircraft systems (UASs), and drones; troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing problems for Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), Unmanned aircraft systems (UASs), and dronesACTIVE—
041Training services in the field of Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), Unmanned aircraft systems (UASs), and dronesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 21, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 21, 2026GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2026XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 21, 2026GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2026CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 20, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 20, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 6, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 29, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 23, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance