USPTO serial 99718668
HUMAN-LED, AI-POWERED OFFENSIVE SECURITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 3, 2026
- Examiner
- ESPINOZA, JALYN NMN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 700 means the trademark is registered and active on the Principal Register. You have nationwide rights for the listed goods and services and may use ®. Section 8 maintenance is due between years five and six. Calendar Section 8 between years five and six, and consider trademark monitoring.
Need help with HUMAN-LED, AI-POWERED OFFENSIVE SECURITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Francisco, CA, US
San Francisco, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Preetha Chakrabarti
Preetha Chakrabarti Crowell & Moring LLP375 Ninth Avenue, 44th FloorTwo Manhattan WestNew York, NY 10001Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for penetration testing in the field of computer security and risk assessment, vulnerability analysis, and security for computers, computer systems and computer networks; consultancy, testing, research and advisory services in the field of risk, vulnerability analysis and security for computers, computer systems and computer networks; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of software and computer network problems; computer security consultancy in the field of cyber security software; computer security consultancy in the field of scanning and penetration testing of computers and networks to assess information security vulnerability; computer software testing for identifying security vulnerability; Computer security consultancy in the field of vulnerability assessment, security control validation, exercise support, penetration testing, threat emulation, and red teaming; Computer security services in the nature of providing security reports and metrics regarding third party systems, applications, virtualizations, and networks; testing of computer software for analyzing security vulnerability; quality control for others | ACTIVE | Sep 25, 2025 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2026 | NRCS | NOTICE OF REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2026 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 2, 2026 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 11, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 10, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2026 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jul 8, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 8, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |