USPTO serial 99719326
VG-SPX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LINDEMANN, ROBIN R
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 136
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VG-SPX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jared M. Barrett
Jared M. Barrett Seed Intellectual Property Law Group LLP701 5th Avenue, Suite 5400Seattle, WA 98104United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Tweezers; electric hair clippers; manual egg slicers; non-electric bonito flake slicers; tongs, namely, fire tongs; non-electric can openers; ice picks; manual vegetable peelers; manual fruit peelers; manual vegetable slicers; manual vegetable shredders; manual vegetable choppers; spoons being tableware; manual cheese slicers; manual pizza cutters; forks being tableware; storage cases for cutlery being boxes specially adapted for the storage of cutlery and flatware; pedicure sets; eyelash curlers; manicure sets; hair removing tweezers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 7, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |