USPTO serial 99719778
TETHER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHERMAN, GENEVA R
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 133
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TETHER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julianne A. Henley
Julianne A. Henley Sparrow IP PLLC1567 Highlands Drive NE, Suite 110-290Issaquah, WA 98029United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Surgical robots; prosthetics and artificial implants; hearing aids; medical electrodes; Electrodes for medical use; medical implants; implantable devices for medical use; robotic prosthetics; Robotic exoskeleton suits for medical purposes; Robotic arms for use by mobility-impaired individuals; Wearable walking assistive robots for medical purposes; Prosthetic intraocular implants; Prosthetic sockets used to fasten prosthetic limbs to the body; Prosthetic limbs, namely, arms, feet, legs; Medical hearing instruments; Assistive listening device for the hearing impaired; Brain pacemakers; Brain-computer interface electrodes for medical use; Brain-computer-interface equipment for medical purposes; Brain-computer-interface equipment for medical purposes, namely, hearing, visual, motor, and speaking assistant devices; Brain-computer-interface equipment with embedded software for medical purposes; Brain-computer-interface equipment with embedded software for medical purposes, namely, hearing, visual, motor, and speaking assistant devices; robotic exoskeleton gloves for medical purposes; medical robots for treating children’s language disorders; robotic exoskeleton gloves for physical therapy purposes; portable walking assistive robots for medical purposes; medical robots for use in cognitive therapy for children; medical robots with attached spoons for assisting physically disabled persons with eating; artificial limbs; Corrective glasses; Eyeglasses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 9, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 25, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |