Drawing for WIGGLY

USPTO serial 99722377

WIGGLY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WIGGLY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eunyoung Lee

Eunyoung Lee MONAMI LAW GROUP PLLC816A Ambrose Ln.MANASSAS PARK, VA 20111United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Electric make-up removing appliances; facial cleansing brushes; facial cleansing sponges; electric exfoliating brushes; exfoliating brushes; abrasive sponges for scrubbing the skin; sound wave vibration hairbrushes; make-up removing appliances, non-electric; massage sponges; facial cleansing brushes, electric and non-electric; hair combs and bath sponges; make-up removing appliances; cosmetic utensils in the nature of make-up sponges and facial cleansing brushesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 6, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 6, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 6, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 11, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 11, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 14, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 24, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 24, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance