Drawing for BOYLES HERITAGE MEATS

USPTO serial 99725052

BOYLES HERITAGE MEATS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WHITE, TRAVIS WILLIAM
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 126

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BOYLES HERITAGE MEATS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kimberly N. Fisher

Kimberly N. Fisher Kolitch Romano Dascenzo Gates LLP621 SW Morrison Street #1100Portland, OR 97205United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Meat, chicken, beef, pork, sausages, and seafood, not live; grinds, namely, tube-shaped or square-shaped ground meat; beef patties, chicken patties, and pork patties; crumbles, namely, protein meat fully cooked and diced in the form of crumbles; formed and whole muscle items, namely, primal cuts of meat formed or sold as the whole muscle; frozen, prepared and packaged meals consisting primarily of meatACTIVE—
030Bread; bread loaves; baguettes; filones, namely, traditional Italian yeast bread; bread rolls; submarine sandwiches; ciabatta bread; sandwiches; wrap sandwichesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 3, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 3, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 3, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 27, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 27, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 7, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 4, 2026MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 25, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 25, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance