USPTO serial 99726415
BIG KELP HYDRATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROBINSON, GAYONNE N
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 138
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BIG KELP HYDRATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelle C. Morris
Michelle C. Morris The Law Office of Michelle C. Morris - Launch IP18 St. Marks Place, Suite 2Brooklyn, NY 11217United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical additives for use in the manufacture of cosmetics, made in whole or significant part of kelp; Chemical additives for the manufacture of cosmetic and personal care products, namely, an active bioactive ingredient made in whole or significant part of kelp extract for skin hydration and skin barrier support | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2024 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 2, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |