USPTO serial 99726881
THE FOAM ROLLER THAT DOESN’T ROLL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCARTHY, JOSEPH PATRICK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with THE FOAM ROLLER THAT DOESN’T ROLL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Falmouth, MA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Holly M. Ford Lewis
Holly M. Ford Lewis Panitch Schwarze Belisario & Nadel LLP2005 Market Street, Suite 3325One Commerce SquarePhiladelphia, PA 19103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Foam positioning pads for medical and physical therapy use; Physical exercise apparatus for medical purposes; Manually-operated exercise equipment for physical therapy purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | exercise and fitness equipment, namely foam rollers; stretching and mobility tools | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Education services, namely, providing seminars, podcasts, and lectures in the field of ergonomics, nutrition, sports, fitness, health care, and rehabilitation, including chiropractic care, and entertainment related content; Consulting services in the fields of fitness and exercise | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 5, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |