USPTO serial 99727982
REAL DECISIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KENNEDY, LAURA E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 130
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Deadline: November 27, 2026
Need help with REAL DECISIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Office Action issues
The examiner requires you to provide an acceptable domicile street address, refused your trademark as merely descriptive—which is a serious issue—and rejected your specimen for not showing the mark used with your software services.
Owner
Covina, CA, US
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software design and development; Consulting services in the field of software as a service (SAAS); Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for application and database integration; Technology consultation in the field of artificial intelligence; Design and development of artificial intelligence (AI) software; Research, design and development of software using artificial intelligence; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for decision making, decision enforcement, and decision governance.; Research in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) software for decision making, decision enforcement, and decision governance.; Providing on-line non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence (AI) for decision making, decision enforcement, and decision governance.; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for decision making, decision enforcement, and decision governance.; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for decision making, decision enforcement, and decision governance. | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2026 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2026 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 19, 2026 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2026 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |