USPTO serial 99728345
WIPRO INTELLIGENCE PROOF OVER PROMISE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TANNER, MICHAEL R
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WIPRO INTELLIGENCE PROOF OVER PROMISE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bangalore Karnataka, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Naresh Kilaru
Naresh Kilaru Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP901 New York Avenue, NWWashington, DC 20001United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management consultancy services; Business advisory and consulting services in the field of data analytics in the fields of information technology, software design, and cloud computing | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consultancy in the field of software design; Computer services, namely, remote management of the operational technology (OT) systems of others; Computer services, namely, on-site management of operational technology (OT) systems of others; Planning, design and management of information technology systems; Computer programming and software design; Consulting services in the field of cloud computing; Computer technology support services, namely, help desk services; Consulting services in the field of software as a service (SAAS); Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for the automation and management of information technology systems; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software to analyze data; Technology advisory and consulting services in the field of information technology, namely, IT project management, computer software consulting, and technical consulting in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) software customization; Technology advisory and consulting services in the field of data analysis, namely, computer programming consultancy for data processing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 6, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2026 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2026 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Jun 3, 2026 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |