USPTO serial 99731727
ANGELIC SINGULARITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 616
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, LIEF ANDREW
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ANGELIC SINGULARITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Wichita, KS, US
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services, namely, providing courses, workshops, and training for certification in the field of ethical artificial intelligence design and stewardship | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | oftware as a service (SaaS) featuring software for ethical artificial intelligence agent orchestration built in accordance with a design framework featuring embedded ethical guidelines; technology consulting services in the field of artificial intelligence governance and stewardship; development of voluntary certifiable standards for the ethical convergence of human knowledge through artificial intelligence systems; testing, analysis, and evaluation of the artificial intelligence software of others to determine conformity with established accreditation standards for a design methodology framework featuring embedded ethical guidelines; providing technology information in the field of artificial intelligence governance frameworks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 1, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2026 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2026 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jun 29, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |