Drawing for APEX CRAWLER

USPTO serial 99733599

APEX CRAWLER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 641Office Action
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 137

What this means

The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.

Status 641: Status 641 means the USPTO mailed a non-final Office Action identifying issues with your application. You typically have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Need help with APEX CRAWLER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter Jensen-Haxel

PO Box 1353Ashland, OR 97520United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Remote control and semi-autonomous robots for identifying remote hazards in buildings and structures for military, law enforcement, and first responders; Remote controlled tactical robots for use by SWAT teams and law enforcement; Mobile robots sensing persons, light, chemicals, and sound for use by SWAT teams, law enforcement, and first responders; Remote control and robots for sensing CBRN (chemical biological radiation nuclear) signatures; Recorded software for operating remote control and semi-autonomous robots for use by military, law enforcement, and first responders; Security surveillance robots; Tactical robots; Self-propelled remote control robots for identifying hazards prior to human exposure within structures, confined areas, and low visibility areas; Remote controlled robots for relaying audio vision streams for military, law enforcement, and first respondersACTIVE—
042Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for controlling autonomous vehicles for law enforcement, police, firefighters, first responders, and SWAT teams; SAAS featuring software for control and semi-autonomous robots for detecting remote hazards in buildings and structures for military, law enforcement, and first responders; SAAS featuring software for deploying, controlling, and monitoring mobile robotic rovers and audio vision streams thereof used for military, law enforcement, and first responders; SAAS featuring software for display and analysis of CBRN (chemical biological radiation nuclear) signatures sensed through remote control sensing robots; SAAS featuring software for AI recognition of persons and hazards through analysis of audio-visual streams of robots for use by military, law enforcement, and first responders; Technological consultation in the technology field of robotics for law enforcement, police, firefighters, first responders, and SWAT teamsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 30, 2026XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Sep 30, 2026XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Jul 4, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 4, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 4, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 30, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 30, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance