Drawing for DDIG

USPTO serial 99734175

DDIG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 692
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SCLEIDOROVICH, JOANNA YAEL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DDIG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
BSoftware vendor services in the dental industry and electronic health records managing; Computer software development in the field of dental health; Research and development of computer software in the field of dental health; Development of computer software for dental health data management; Vendor management services for healthcare facilities; Management of the dental health information technology (IT) systems of others; IT integration services in the field of dental health; Electronic data storage; Data analysis services for health care recordsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 2026PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Oct 5, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 30, 2026GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 30, 2026XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2026GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 30, 2026CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 2, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 2, 2026ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 31, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 31, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 29, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 30, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance