USPTO serial 99734190
AIUC-1
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, CHRISTIAN EDMUND
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 134
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AIUC-1?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Betsy Wang Lee
Betsy Wang Lee Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP2050 Main Street, Suite 1100IP Prosecution DepartmentIrvine, CA 92614-8255Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Developing certification and accreditation standards for artificial intelligence (AI) agents, systems, and platforms to the order and specification of others; technical and industrial research, testing, monitoring, analysis, and evaluation of AI agents, systems, and platforms to determine conformity with certification and accreditation standards; quality management services, namely, quality evaluation and analysis, quality assurance, and quality control, all in the field of AI; product testing in the field of AI; technical auditing services in the field of AI in the nature of technical testing, technical analysis, and technical evaluation of AI systems and AI software; technological planning and consulting services in the field of AI; development and establishment of testing specifications and procedures for the AI industry | ACTIVE | Jul 23, 2025 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |