USPTO serial 99734198
WEBBER INNOVATION. COHERENT SYSTEMS DESIGN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 137
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with WEBBER INNOVATION. COHERENT SYSTEMS DESIGN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sheridan, WY, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael Johnson
Michael Johnson Johnson Evans & Headrick, P.C.222 Second SouthSuite 1250Nashville, TN 37201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consulting services in the field of organizational systems design, operational alignment, and incentive structure development | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical consulting services in the fields of datacenter architecture, public and private cloud computing solutions, and evaluation and implementation of internet technology and services; Technological planning and consulting services in the field of systems architecture, organizational systems design, and analysis of complex technological and operational systems; Computer services, namely, designing and implementing systems architecture for organizations and technology platforms for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |