USPTO serial 99736055
MAXIMUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DIGAN, MATTHEW M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAXIMUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Theodore R. Remaklus
Theodore R. Remaklus Thompson Hine LLP312 Walnut Street, Suite 2000Cincinnati, OH 45202-4024United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Power operated blowers, namely, axial flow lawn debris blowers; Chain saws, namely, electric chain saws; Machines for cleaning surfaces using high pressure water, namely, pressure washers and high pressure washers; Power-operated water spray guns; Lawn mowers, robotic lawnmowers, riding lawn mowers; Snow blowers; Snow throwers; Power-operated sprayers, namely, multi-purpose high pressure washers; Vacuum cleaners, namely, robotic vacuum cleaners, electric vacuum cleaners and cordless vacuum cleaners; Vacuum cleaners for outdoor use; Power operated tools, namely, lawn and garden edgers; Power-operated lawn edgers and electric lawn edgers; Power-operated tools, namely, power tools, in the nature of drilling machines, impact wrenches, impact drivers, hammer drilling machines, rotary hammer, saws, multifunction saws, angle grinders, jig saws, reciprocating saws, circular saws, sanders; none of the foregoing being blowing machines for the compression, exhaustion or transport of gases | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 6, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |