USPTO serial 99736357
GRACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLEBBE, KEVIN ROBERT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with GRACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Baton Rouge, LA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Chad A. Grand
Chad A. Grand ROY KIESEL FORD DOODY & NORTH, APLCP.O. Box 15928Baton Rouge, LA 70895United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consulting, management, and planning services in the field of architecture services, planning services, interior design services, mechanical engineering services, sustainability services in the fields of industrial, healthcare, educational and other commercial, hospitality, themed entertainment, higher education, sports & recreation, civic and public safety, senior living, forensic architecture, and program management | ACTIVE | Aug 31, 2025 |
| 042 | Architectural services; Interior design services; Mechanical engineering | ACTIVE | Aug 31, 2025 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |