USPTO serial 99739203
CENSYS INTERNET MAP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SIME, JONATHAN PAUL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 138
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CENSYS INTERNET MAP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ann Arbor, MI, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID R. STEVENS
DAVID R. STEVENS STEVENS LAW GROUP1754 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE STE 226SAN JOSE, CA 95110United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Technology consultation in the field of cybersecurity; Cybersecurity services in the nature of restricting unauthorized access to computer systems; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for discovering, monitoring, and analyzing devices that are accessible from the internet in the field of cybersecurity; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for building searchable data sets to support security practitioners in their efforts to make Internet-facing systems secure and safe; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for building searchable data sets in the field of cyber security; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for performing security investigations, and scanning threats and capabilities on the internet; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for scanning the public Internet Protocol address space; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for scanning the internet to provide comprehensive data sets of internet intelligence and security threat details; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for threat hunting, identifying suspicious infrastructure, discovering compromised internet hosts, and detecting intrusions; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for providing visibility and insights to protect against critical threats to bolster cybersecurity capabilities | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 14, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |