USPTO serial 99739593
PBD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with PBD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
The Princess Bride Diamonds, Inc.
Huntington Beach, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roger N. Behle, Jr.
Roger N. Behle, Jr. FOLEY BEZEK BEHLE & CURTIS, LLP15 West Carrillo Street Suite 200Santa Barbara, CA 93101United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed brochures about jewlery; Printed brochures about advertising a catalog of jewelry products; Printed informational flyers featuring a catalog of jewelry products; Printed products, namely, product guides featuring jewelry products; Printed paper labels for use on shopping bags and boxes for jewelry; Printed publications, namely, hand outs and borchures in the field of jewelry; Paper signs; Printed paper signs featuring jewelry for use in storefront signage | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2023 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |