USPTO serial 99740575
SPRINTER SEER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILLER, CHARLES FREDERICK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPRINTER SEER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Westlake Village, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan Pearce
Jonathan Pearce SoCal IP Law Group LLP310 N. Westlake Blvd., Suite 120Westlake Village, CA 91362United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable enterprise software for evaluating, quantifying, providing analytics, and providing detailed analysis of patient quality and potential risk or liability of rendering in-person medical services and counseling related to medical issues of patients, provided by doctors, nurses, phlebotomists, or other medical professionals and for providing insights, recommendations, forecasts and intervention planning to health plan operators, medical professionals, and patients; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for evaluating, quantifying, providing analytics, and providing detailed analysis of patient quality and potential risk or liability ofrendering in-person medical services and counseling related to medical issues of patients, provided by doctors, nurses, phlebotomists, or other medical professionals and for providing insights, recommendations, forecasts and intervention planning to health plan operators, medical professionals, and patients; Providing temporary use of a non-downloadable web application for evaluating, quantifying, providing analytics, and providing detailed analysis of patient quality and potential risk or liability of rendering in-person medical services and counseling related to medical issues of patients, provided by doctors, nurses, phlebotomists, or other medical professionals and for providing insights, recommendations, forecasts and intervention planning to health plan operators, medical professionals, and patients; Providing temporary use of a web-based software application for evaluating, quantifying, providing analytics, and providing detailed analysis of patient quality and potential risk or liability ofrendering in-person medical services and counseling related to medical issues of patients, provided by doctors, nurses, hlebotomists, or other medical professionals and for providing insights, recommendations, forecasts and intervention planning to health plan operators, medical professionals, and patients | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 27, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |