USPTO serial 99742688
TRACKER TOUCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 681
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELL, JUSTIN T
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRACKER TOUCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Carlsbad, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brittany S. Smith
Brittany S. Smith Barnes & Thornburg LLP11 South Meridian StreetIndianapolis, IN 46204United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software, computer hardware and downloadable mobile applications for use with commercial vehicle navigation systems, and for monitoring, tracking, locating, and recovering persons and assets via transponder units, police tracking computers, radio frequency technology, global positioning systems (GNPS), cellular communications, WAIF networks, Internet, and Time Difference of Arrival technology and triangulation method systems; telematic apparatus, namely, electronic devices for use in transmitting and communicating vehicle data by means of interactive vehicle navigation systems and for monitoring, tracking, locating, and recovering persons and assets; transponders; computer hardware for tracking and preventing theft of assets | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | electronic monitoring services for safety, security and protection purposes in the field of tracking, locating, and recovering persons and assets; vehicle driver telematics services in the nature of providing information concerning safety of driver behavior, maintenance or diagnostic code alerts, fuel consumption, navigation and traffic avoidance; security consultancy; vehicle tracking services for safety and theft prevention purposes; theft recovery services, namely, tracking, locating monitoring, and recovering of vehicles; vehicle fleet monitoring services for safety purposes; all of the foregoing rendered in connection with the use of radio frequency technology, global positioning systems (GPS), cellular communications, WAIF networks, Internet, and Time Difference of Arrival technology and triangulation method systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2026 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 9, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |