USPTO serial 99746825
COMTEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUSKIN, MATTHEW SEAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COMTEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Duane A. Stewart III
Duane A. Stewart III Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC501 Grant StreetSuite 200Pittsburgh, PA 15219Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | restroom cubicles in the nature of non-metal shower cubicles; privacy cubicles being non-metal shower cubicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Restroom partitions in the nature of non-metal building materials; restroom cubicles, namely, non-metal toilet partitions being construction materials; urinal dividers being non-metal partitions for building; privacy cubicles being non-metal partitions for building | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1989 |
| 020 | bathroom vanities, not of metal | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 20, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |