USPTO serial 99752422
FREYBE PROTEIN TOPPER TRIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EISNACH, MICHAEL PATRICK
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FREYBE PROTEIN TOPPER TRIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Richmond, BC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kimberly N. Fisher
Kimberly N. Fisher Kolitch Romano Dascenzo Gates LLP621 SW Morrison Street #1100Portland, OR 97205United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat; beef; poultry; pork; veal; bison meat; buffalo meat; lamb meat; game, not live; fresh, refrigerated and processed meats; smoked meats; cured meats; deli meats; meat based snack foods; sliced meat; dried meat; marinated meat; preserved meat; canned meat; luncheon meats; packaged meat; cooked and prepared meats; bacon; sausage; sausage products of all types, namely, fresh, cooked, smoked, processed and dried sausage products in the nature of ham sausage, beef sausage, chicken sausage, turkey sausage, mushroom sausage, summer sausage, tongue sausage, beer sausage being beer brats and bierwurst, liver sausage; salami; patè; pepperoni; jerky made from meat; roast beef; ham | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 1, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |